Aurora Homepage
Main Hardware Software Cables/Adapters Forum Contact
Forum Home Forum Home > Aurora Sequencer Software > Aurora 1.0
  Active Topics Active Topics
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Hardware / Software
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Pony_God View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 551 		  Quote Pony_God Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Hardware / Software
    Posted: 11 Sep 2008 at 3:16pm
I have an Audigy something in my 2003 box. I'll look next time I have it on.
Fine. You're so smart you rig up the lights.
D-Light users Unite!
Back to Top
bdkeen View Drop Down
Beta Testers
Beta Testers


Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Location: Easton,PA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 380 		  Quote bdkeen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Sep 2008 at 3:07pm
I have it installed on my 2003 server - if I had a sound card it might work Confused.  I'm setting up another 2003 server to try load it on.  I tried it on Windows 2008, and forget it. - videoedit.ocx doesn't and won't register so I'm giving up on the 2008 attempt for now.
 
I'll go back to trying 2008 sometime later but for now I'll settle on 2003.
Back to Top
LightsOnLogan View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3187 		  Quote LightsOnLogan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2008 at 7:46am
HW requirements & recommendations:
 
Scheduler:
P3 700MHz 256MB
(this means you can have a really low spec "show computer")
 
Sequencer:
I don't have an official CPU spec yet, but pretty much anything Intel/AMD 1GHz+.  RAM requirements are a bit more for the sequencer portion due to all of the graphic and audio processing.  While Aurora will run on less by automatically switching to disk rendering instead of RAM rendering, having at least 1GB RAM is preferred for a less sluggish editing experience (particularly with the wait for "generating preview frames" at higher zoom levels).  Playback will not chop without the higher RAM, but you'll enjoy life a lot more with it.
 
As an aside, while it is not an officially supported configuration, one end user has reported success runing Aurora on a Mac under Parallels.
 
Plugins:
Hang in there a couple months.  We have the importer SDK and file manipulation SDK completed but not documented.  The exporter SDK is next followed by the protocol SDK and of course all of the documentation.
Back to Top
Pony_God View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 551 		  Quote Pony_God Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Sep 2008 at 11:50pm
Booted... yes. did it actually _do_ anything after that?
 
Yes, must have Firefly support and a color picker! Big%20smile Mine's all ordered and I really don't want to be sequencing 48 channels for 16 pixels. I'm happy to test after mine shows up. DMX, not so much.
 
So who do I need to talk with about authority/info to create a plugin?
Fine. You're so smart you rig up the lights.
D-Light users Unite!
Back to Top
LightChristmas View Drop Down
Beta Testers
Beta Testers
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Location: Equality, IL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 993 		  Quote LightChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Sep 2008 at 11:40pm
Hey, Windows ME "ran" on a Celeron.......LOL

There is a provision in Aurora for "plug-ins". You've already seen three - the importers. It will likely be awhile before Michael nails down/distributes the requirements needed for a 3rd party plug-in, but it will come eventually. There's bigger fish to fry right now - FireFly and DMX.

Edited by LightChristmas - 01 Sep 2008 at 11:41pm

Back to Top
Pony_God View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 551 		  Quote Pony_God Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Sep 2008 at 10:34pm

Wow... a celeron? Nothing runs on a celeron!
I'll be on a 1U SuperMicro  P4 3.2Ghz with 2G DDR2 running server 2003.

Are there any plans on a command line interface or programming API to be added at some point?
Fine. You're so smart you rig up the lights.
D-Light users Unite!
Back to Top
LightChristmas View Drop Down
Beta Testers
Beta Testers
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Location: Equality, IL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 993 		  Quote LightChristmas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Sep 2008 at 10:06pm
Originally posted by Pony_God

Alright, so the XP requirements are a P3 - 700MHZ with 256 RAM...
1. Is that optimal or minimal for XP?
2. Recomended hardware for Vista?
3. What about Windows Server 2003?
 
What's the average box specs that's been running Aurora?


Here's what I've been using:

XP - AMD Athlon 64 1.xMhz 720MB RAM ATI Radeon 64MB RAM
XP - Intel Celeron 800Mhz 512MB RAM  VIA on-board graphics chipset. (longer load time but no stutters - scheduler works with no probs)
Vista - Intel Pentium dual-core 1.8Ghz, 1GB RAM, ATI Radeon Xpress 200M (noteboook)

Back to Top
Pony_God View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 Sep 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 551 		  Quote Pony_God Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Sep 2008 at 9:58pm
Alright, so the XP requirements are a P3 - 700MHZ with 256 RAM...
1. Is that optimal or minimal for XP?
2. Recomended hardware for Vista?
3. What about Windows Server 2003?
 
What's the average box specs that's been running Aurora?
Fine. You're so smart you rig up the lights.
D-Light users Unite!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.06
Copyright ©2001-2007 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.781 seconds.